Send a multisig inner transaction

General
1

Hello,

I have created a multisig with 2 addresses and a threshold of 1.

One address comes from a normal account, the second address is the application address of a smart contract.

Can I make an inner transaction from the smart contract with the “Sender” field set to the multisig address to spend funds from there?

2

Welcome to Algorand!

No, you cannot do it right now.
If you need to be able to use the account from both a smart contract and a normal address, then you currently need to set the account to be the application account and to allow the smart contract to issue arbitrary transactions using appropriate TEAL code.

3

Thank you for the welcome :slight_smile:

Ok, got it, of course that’s the most general approach.

I would like to create a “smart wallet” that offers extended functionalities (e.g., recovery mechanisms) so having an address controlled by a smart contract is the way to go.

I guess the big hurdle to overcome then will be how to interact with Dapps since they won’t be able to simply send transactions to be signed, it will require to create a new wallet communication standard to implement for Dapps creator (or manually integrate with each of them through ABI if they expose it).

Back to the drawing board :slight_smile:

4

For that purpose, you may actually want to use smart signatures/logicsigs (contract accounts) rather than applications. This is one of the cases where smart signatures are useful.

5

mmm… not sure how that would work.

To make a concrete case: imagine a feature that let you designate a second account as backup for a primary account and a timeout after which the second account can be used to recover the primary account. You need to be able to extend the timeout periodically before expiration and if you fail to do so (e.g., you have lost the primary key), you can then use the backup key.

One way to implement this is to create a delegated signature signed by the primary key that rekeys the account to the secondary key if the timeout is expired. The timeout has to be stored in a smart contract where it can be extended and the smart signature has to check it is part of a group transaction involving the smart contract for approval.

This could work but it is complicated by the fact that you need to store the delegated signature, if you lose it you are out of luck. If a smart contract could be part of a multisig then it could be used to rekey the address directly.

Another alternative would be if smart contracts could store transactions in their state and then send them to the blockchain at a later stage. So you could send the delegated signature to the smart contract and have it issue it to the blockchain if the timeout expires.

6

You can do that using smart signatures + smart contracts, as follows:

  • the account is a smart signature contract / logicsig account that works as follows:
  • the associated smart contract implements whatever logic you want and can approve specific transactions according to this logic. For example, it may require to be call once alone to initiate the timeout period. And when the timeout period ends, then it can be called together with a rekey transaction of the logicsig account.

Just store the logicsig in the note of a first transaction of the account to itself. This way, anyone can easily recover it.

7

Sounds great, will try with that!
Thank you for the thoughtful answer!