When does people learn to reference their thoughts? As was said in the governance talk, you can delegate the algorand fuondation. I think it was said that at the start only algorand foundation can be delegated, but I may be wrong in this. Can you delegate Scholtz for the 60% of your voting power and algo foundation 40%?
Also the category delegation adds there the knowledge aggregation which I have not seen any proposal by the foundation. Perhaps because algorand foundation did not shared with us what they want to ask in the governance. In the discord was clearly said that the governance will for example not be used on decision which projects should be funded.
Why does people think that whatever is written under silivo’s name it must be the only best solution?
Btw, I believe that the algorand is screwing the system with the governance rewards… Why do you want to block people’s algos on their accounts and stop the staking rewards completely?? The rich who does not need to use algos will get more rich and poor will not get the rewards for staking… Great choice guys… The concentration of algos to early backers is bad and noone from the algo inc or foundation seems to care…
I would like to request comments and/or improvements for the schema of the decentralized knowledge based pure democracy voting system.
because they must show activity on algorand by at least participating in governance if not consensus. no free loaders, you can set up a charity and donate to free loaders